Devolution deal off if Norfolk says no

East Anglian Devolution looks like it is holed below the waterline, as Norfolk County Council look set to vote against the deal.

Westminster hopes for a deal between Suffolk and Norfolk appear to be fading fast, as Norfolk County Council looks set to walk away from a multi-million-pound deal over concerns about the proposal for a Mayor of East Anglia.

Devolution was proposed by Suffolk County Council after the Government asked for volunteers to show how devolved power could be shared in rural two-tier communities. But the County was rebuffed by the Government, who insisted that the population was simply too small to make a deal possible.

Instead a deal including Norfolk was encouraged, based around the New Anglia Local Enterprise Partnership, which has been seen by the Treasury as key to all the devolution deals so far. A deal seemed certain, but Westminster overreach saw former Deputy Prime Minister Michael Heseltine attempt to drag Cambridgeshire and Peterborough into the deal as well.

Concerns about the requirement for a Mayor to lead the Combined Authority, described as a new layer of local Government, began to surface across Cambridgeshire and then spread across Norfolk; there has been less concern about a Mayor in Suffolk, though councillors have made very clear that they were unhappy with the idea.

Yet the pubic consultation indicated that a slim majority backed the idea of a single person to make decisions for Suffolk and Norfolk, who could be held accountable for decisions. Potential Mayoral candidates included Suffolk County Council leader Colin Noble, who expressed an interest to Spy, and other names mentioned included Andy Wood, Chief Executive of Adnams and the Independent Chair of the East Anglia Devolution Leaders Group, and Mark Pendlington, the Chairman of the New Anglia LEP.

However, it is reported that the Leader of the Conservatives on Norfolk County Council, Cliff Jordan, has given a free vote to his colleagues on the issue, and doesn’t believe he can win a vote on the current deal. Labour’s former (Norfolk) Council leader George Nobbs, who signed an agreement to work more closely together with former Suffolk County Council Leader Mark Bee, has publicly opposed this deal, and several Norfolk councils have rejected the proposals.

Chief Secretary to the Treasury David Gauke has made clear that without a Mayor the deal is dead, and the former Northgate pupil is unlikely to do a deal to allow Suffolk to go it alone. If Norfolk’s councillors cannot be persuaded by the time Suffolk votes on 23rd November, then devolution won’t happen in Suffolk or Norfolk; the Government plans to lay orders in Parliament to allow the process to move forward on 24th November, and if a deal hasn’t been agreed then there won’t be another chance.

Advertisements

One thought on “Devolution deal off if Norfolk says no

  1. History dictates that Suffolk will never share power with Ipswich. Ipswich was a confident County Borough in its own right, and influential county town and stake holder of East Suffolk Authority. The two Ipswich led Authorities merged with West Suffolk in 1974, yet today under Suffolk County Council cabinet does not contain a single person living from Ipswich to Felixstowe. Suffolk’s economic and urban centre has been excluded from power for the most part of 40 years, and it tells in the lack of vision, direction, infrastructure and accountability. A full reform of local government is now required. Devolution Anglia will mean a convergence of 2 County Councils and 14 District Boroughs a LEP, 2 Police Crime Commissioners, CCG Health Areas; and around 159 County and 782 district councillors. With roughly 100,000 more population, Norfolk will always dominate proceedings and the mayor. It is simply unworkable, and will only serve to magnify the democratic deficit. I strongly suggest to do it efficiently, fairly and proportionately and promoting democracy for all within East Anglia, as six equally balanced and represented unitary councils (Grtr Ipswich and grtr Norwich), plus Suffolk East and West, and Norfolk North and South. This would ensure greater accountability, focus and direction for our areas. I propose East Suffolk (with Lowestoft as administrational HQ), West Suffolk (with Bury St Edmunds as administrational HQ) and Grtr Ipswich (with Ipswich as administrational HQ) would spread both political control and accountability more fairly for all in Suffolk and Norfolk.

Please tell us what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s